Unreasonable Searches and Seizures Article Reviews Essay

Total Length: 581 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 2

Criminal Investigation: Article Reviews



Eligon, J. (2011). Police sergeant to get jail term for perjury and illegal searches. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/28/nyregion/nyc-police- sergeant-admits-illegal-searches-and-perjury.html



This article highlights the problem of officers conducting illegal searches when they strongly suspect a suspect is guilty, even though they have no legally valid form of probable cause or a warrant to conduct such a search. These types of egregious actions are a source of mistrust and friction between members of the police force and the public. The officer’s lawyer, in an appeal for clemency, stated that the offending officer never arrested anyone who had not committed a crime after he had conducted further investigation and found incriminating evidence. Still, the officer’s actions call into question the constitutional protections accorded to suspects and the fact that the officer was able to get away with his actions for so long demonstrates the difficulty of contesting the word of an officer in a court of law.



Greenhouse, L. (2014). The Supreme Court Justices have cellphones, too. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/26/opinion/linda-greenhouse- the-supreme-court-justices-have-cellphones-too.html



This article suggests that while the US Supreme Court justices are sworn to uphold the law, their own personal biases and experiences may influence them. Author Greenhouse (2014) notes that one reason the Court may have drawn the line permitting luggage to be squeezed without probable cause is that as passengers they may have found such practices personally distasteful and intrusive—and thus were motivated to see such actions as a violation against the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Stuck Writing Your "Unreasonable Searches and Seizures Article Reviews" Essay?

Similarly, a ban against the warrantless search of cellphones was found to be overly intrusive, given that the justices likely have such devices themselves. However, Greenhouse also suggests that interactions with police more common to persons of color, such as that of a man who ran away from the sight of police cars in broad daylight are less apt to be viewed as benign given that they do not conform to the justices’ framework of personal experiences. Legal ideology is inevitably affected by the personal perspective of the justices. The ability to empathize with the situation affects legal interpretations.



Liptak, A. (2011). Judges allow search if police hear evidence being destroyed. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/17/us/17scotus.html



According to an 8-1 US Supreme Court decision, police may enter a home if they have convincing evidence that evidence is being destroyed; in the case of this particular decision the officers were alerted by the smell of burning marijuana. While supporters of the….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Unreasonable Searches And Seizures Article Reviews" (2017, October 16) Retrieved March 28, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/unreasonable-searches-seizures-article-reviews-essay

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Unreasonable Searches And Seizures Article Reviews" 16 October 2017. Web.28 March. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/unreasonable-searches-seizures-article-reviews-essay>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Unreasonable Searches And Seizures Article Reviews", 16 October 2017, Accessed.28 March. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/unreasonable-searches-seizures-article-reviews-essay