Language Acquisition" (2004), the Authors Research Paper

Total Length: 988 words ( 3 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 3

It seems unbelievable how infants go from not knowing anything at all, to knowing how to express themselves in every way they can. They first learn how to tell their parents what they want by either pointing or yelling until they get what it is that they want, to actually putting words together to tell them exactly in the language that parents will understand. The question still arises as to how they learn so quickly. The idea that babies come preprogrammed to learn how to speak has been debated among scholars for ages. It seems to be the most plausible hypothesis since language is learned so early on in life.

The fact that so much brain processes go into the language development stage gives a lot of evidence to how innate language really is. When certain areas of the brain are either damaged, or not fully evolved, language deficiencies present themselves, and this gives more meaning to the idea that nature has a bigger role in language development than anything else. It is because language ans speech are so ingrained on our brains, that it is compromised by any deviation it proper development. Given that infants brain develop at such a rapid pace, room for mistakes are bound to appear, and this could be where the environment that the infant is exposed to, could come into affect.

Learning is a process that could vary by culture, and this is something that the articles attempted to describe, but didn't quite do a good job at it. Culture influences a lot in the way one learns, and especially for a baby, who learns everything to do in life, by imitating their parents and those around them. In a lot of language development theories, culture is something that is put aside as a side factor and not as a factor that could actually affect the development of both hearing and speaking.

Stuck Writing Your "Language Acquisition" (2004), the Authors" Research Paper?

If something were to be criticized from these articles is that not all factors are taken into account when trying to determine the exact plausibilities of the theories presented. Some things might affect language development that are not necessarily measurable no matter what test is done, whether it be electronic or by pencil and paper.

In conclusion, language is a very complex notion. It entails a lot of understanding from all parties involved. It is difficult to understand where a toddler learns something from because of the fact that toddlers cannot express themselves in a way that adults could understand. It is sort of like a catch 22; adults want to know where and how infants and toddlers learn, but they cannot express themselves adequately for them to do so.

A lot of research is still needed to be done to fully comprehend language. When it comes to bilingualism or multilingualism, it gets even more complex and harder to understand. Language cannot be defined by a set of norms, but by a set….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Language Acquisition 2004 The Authors" (2011, May 13) Retrieved July 6, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/language-acquisition-2004-authors-44641

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Language Acquisition 2004 The Authors" 13 May 2011. Web.6 July. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/language-acquisition-2004-authors-44641>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Language Acquisition 2004 The Authors", 13 May 2011, Accessed.6 July. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/language-acquisition-2004-authors-44641