Labeling Theory and the Scarlet Letter of Today Letter

Total Length: 1620 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 0

Page 1 of 5

Reflections Digital CriminologyBeing Mean Online and Cyber CrimeBroll and Huey (2015) point out that cyberbullying represents a gray area when it comes to criminal justice, legislation, policing, and prevention. Police prefer to address this matter through education, trying to teach young people and communities how to avoid cyberbullying—but they also do not see every case of cyberbullying as a police matter. Part of the issue here is that there is no substantial legislation that would define cyberbullying as a criminal offense. “Being mean” to someone online, in other words, is hard to define and hard to outlaw—but other questions do arise: such as—is someone engaging in stalking that is a legitimate threat to another person’s safety or privacy? Is someone engaging in abusive conduct online that is meant to harm the other person in a real way by, for example, getting the other person to commit suicide? These are real questions that need to be asked and should be addressed by law enforcement and legislators, because it is certainly the case that cyber bullying has led to suicides, violence, and invasions of privacy in the past. So how can police better address this matter?On the other hand, society has become so sensitive that cancel culture has become a significant movement, and anytime anyone says anything to offend a group online that group might respond with a call for censorship, prosecution, or any other form of retribution: people are quick to lose jobs, careers, reputation, and status after being targeted by the cancel culture movement. So who is really bullying whom here? Does it not seem that in an attempt to eradicate bullies, the cancel culture movement has become a bully? How does one address this problem in the context of cyber bullying and cyber crime? Who should get to define what is permissible and what is off limits? This is a question I would like to look more into as it dovetails with earlier questions raised from the readings about the digital citizenship, e-crime, and victimization.

Stuck Writing Your "Labeling Theory and the Scarlet Letter of Today" Letter?

Khoo (2021) argues that gender-based violence occurs on platforms like social media sites such as Twitter, Facebook, and others, and that these companies and their platforms need to be policed and that action needs to be taken to prevent or root out misogynistic words and actions by users of these platforms. She recommends platform liability models that would provide better protections for women—but to what extent should this kind of recommendation be resisted? How does one draw the line between being rude or being offensive, and being criminal or liable in the court of law? It seems that this attempt to criminalize meanness online is an encroachment on what others might call free speech rights. If people begin to feel they are being denied their rights, there might be pushback and an even worse outcome than before—and I think about what Prohibition did for the criminal world in the US in the 1920s. It really brought organized crime into existence—an unforeseen consequence of too much policing......

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Labeling Theory And The Scarlet Letter Of Today" (2022, March 18) Retrieved July 5, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/labeling-theory-scarlet-today-2180566

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Labeling Theory And The Scarlet Letter Of Today" 18 March 2022. Web.5 July. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/labeling-theory-scarlet-today-2180566>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Labeling Theory And The Scarlet Letter Of Today", 18 March 2022, Accessed.5 July. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/labeling-theory-scarlet-today-2180566