Decision Making and Structure Case Study

Total Length: 1406 words ( 5 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 4

Page 1 of 5

Organizational Planning and Goal Setting

Why the older, original planning and goal setting process will no longer work for H2o Solutions

Today, an organization can adopt any of the three types of organizational structures; the centralized, top-down planning, and the decentralized models. Initially, H2o Solutions followed the centralized and top-down planning model. However, the model became ineffective as the company grew. H2o Solutions now needs to integrate the very employees it has hired into the planning and goal-setting process. This cannot be achieved by the original top-down approach because it puts all the decision-making powers exclusively in the hands of the senior management. The company needs a new model, which will enable the senior managers to disseminate decision-making powers to low-level and middle managers. With the old model, H2o Solutions suffers from adverse impacts of multiple management layers which stretch from the senior leadership down to frontline employees. The senior leaders responsible for making each and every decision at H2o Solutions may need more time to achieve these tasks. This may result in sluggish business operations. In contrast, decentralized companies are likely to struggle with multiple individuals holding varied opinions on a particular business decision. Therefore, such a business can face challenges trying to get everyone on the same page during the decision-making process (Dyck, & Neubert, 2008).

Based on the current management efforts to make companies more responsive and flexible, there is a marked trend towards decentralizing planning and goal setting. In big companies, lower-level managers are closer to the action thus they have detailed knowledge about problems, unlike senior leaders. Therefore, H2o Solutions is among the organizations, which require a decentralized structure because a company of such a scale can have several departments.

Recommended Planning and Goal Setting Approach to the Executive Management

I would recommend a decentralized approach to planning and goal setting. Decentralization has occurred out of necessity due to the company's expansion and the increase in the number of employees. Most importantly, the very employees H2o Solutions have hired now need to be integrated into the planning and goal-setting process.
This implies they must also be included in the decision-making process. This is the cornerstone of the decentralized model. A decentralized model is one whereby the senior leaders shift the power of some decision-making over to the other organizational members at the lower levels. This model allows managers at various departments and levels to come on board and determine the strategic goals. Later, discussions concerning the company goals and objectives are decided upon by incorporating the supervisors and lower-level managers (Cassidy, Kreitner, & Vanhuss, 2014). What follows is that individuals are allowed to contribute to the process through defining their operational objectives and goals. I recommend this approach because it can promote more rapid-fire and informed decision-making at H2o Solutions.

Appropriateness of the Approach to H2o Solutions and Their Priorities

H2o Solutions has grown and the centralized and top-down planning model originally used the by leadership team is now ineffective. The very employees H2o Solutions has hired now need to be integrated into Because their business operations have grown, it is difficult for the senior leadership to manage the company effectively. They may experience challenges finding the time to focus on underperforming areas. By decentralizing, the senior leadership can delegate some of the mundane day-to-day decisions and responsibilities to some capable employees. From the case study, we can see that H2o Solutions hired people who demonstrated a high level of emotional intelligence from its inception. Therefore, the company has the most skilled associates since they are smart, innovative, highly collaborative, relational, and team-based (Daft & Marcic, 2010). These people can offer insightful opinions and bring on the table some of the best decisions that can lead to business success. In the end, the senior leadership will have more time to commit to pressing matters such as developing ways to expand the business or increasing revenue (Dyck, & Neubert, 2008).

How the Approach Will Respond to Market Trends

The current business field is….....

Show More ⇣


     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Decision Making And Structure" (2016, October 12) Retrieved July 1, 2024, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/decision-making-structure-2162741

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Decision Making And Structure" 12 October 2016. Web.1 July. 2024. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/decision-making-structure-2162741>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Decision Making And Structure", 12 October 2016, Accessed.1 July. 2024,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/decision-making-structure-2162741