Application Critiquing Quantitative Qualitative or Mixed Methods Studies Central Venous Catheter Infection Research Paper

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document

Total Length: 634 words ( 2 double-spaced pages)

Total Sources: 2

Page 1 of 2

Jones, 2006), a qualitative study, to (Humar, 2001), a quantitative study, both studies were conducted for the same problem of serious venous catheter-related infections. Both studies were conducted for the same purpose of determining effective methods for venous catheter-related infection prevention. And, both studies used theoretical research of review of previous studies of venous catheter-related infections. Both studies identified limitations in previous studies and (Humar, 2001) identified limitations in the present study.

Where (Jones, 2006) was focused on examining weaknesses and findings of previous studies compared to standard best practices in data collection, (Humar, 2001) was a randomized control trial that tested two antiseptic solutions to determine which one was the most effective at preventing infection in central venous catheter sites. The different designs caused different data analysis where (Humar, 2001) used a statistical analysis of data collected and (Jones, 2006) used an analytical analysis of the instruments used, techniques identified, and the findings of previous research compared to current standard best practices.

Stuck Writing Your "Application Critiquing Quantitative Qualitative or Mixed Methods Studies Central Venous Catheter Infection" Research Paper?

View All Our Example Application Critiquing Quantitative Qualitative or Mixed Methods Studies Central Venous Catheter Infection Research Paper

Have A Custom Example Essay Written



Further research was recommended by (Humar, 2001) due to the significance in limitations of the present study. This study showed no utilization for the nursing practice due to limitations of needing more clarity. On the other hand, (Jones, 2006) made clear recommendations for research reporting to show more clarity in reporting and consider more variables to define the particulars of the studies. This study showed utilization in enhanced standards in the future and more education on infection control.

The qualitative design is advantageous for systematic review into nature or qualities of observable behavior (Ethnography, Observational Research, and Narrative Inquiry, 2013). It uses triangulation to attempt to explain how social structures act and interact. The disadvantage is that it relies less on reliability, validity and generalization. For example, (Jones, 2006) observes procedures from previous literature to compare against standards, but does not rely on experimental elements of reliability, validity, or generalization in the….....

Show More ⇣

     Open the full completed essay and source list


OR

     Order a one-of-a-kind custom essay on this topic


sample essay writing service

Cite This Resource:

Latest APA Format (6th edition)

Copy Reference
"Application Critiquing Quantitative Qualitative Or Mixed Methods Studies Central Venous Catheter Infection" (2013, April 20) Retrieved April 29, 2025, from
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/application-critiquing-quantitative-qualitative-100978

Latest MLA Format (8th edition)

Copy Reference
"Application Critiquing Quantitative Qualitative Or Mixed Methods Studies Central Venous Catheter Infection" 20 April 2013. Web.29 April. 2025. <
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/application-critiquing-quantitative-qualitative-100978>

Latest Chicago Format (16th edition)

Copy Reference
"Application Critiquing Quantitative Qualitative Or Mixed Methods Studies Central Venous Catheter Infection", 20 April 2013, Accessed.29 April. 2025,
https://www.aceyourpaper.com/essays/application-critiquing-quantitative-qualitative-100978
   

Open, View, and/or
Download this Document
order custom essay example